<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I love hyphens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://imjon.com/2008/10/01/i-love-hyphens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://imjon.com/2008/10/01/i-love-hyphens/</link>
	<description>thoughts, ideas, projects and musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 04:33:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: calum</title>
		<link>http://imjon.com/2008/10/01/i-love-hyphens/comment-page-1/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>calum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imjon.com/2008/10/01/i-love-hyphens/#comment-625</guid>
		<description>The hyphen is urgent and key, yes, particularly when dealing with less than canonically phrased phrases; it can aid interpretation and, by increasing the speed with which the text can be comprehended, allows the reader to plough on, unbefuddled.   However, for reasons other than mere contrariness, I would argue that ambiguity is, outside of specific (and often legal) contexts, something that should be revelled in.  Setting aside the possibility that the HRS sign is adverting to a huge sale of huge rugs (something worth considering in these increasingly non-binary (first hyphen!) times), the lack of punctuative clarification allows the beholder the opportunity to visualise if not a panoply then at least an array of possibilities, to allow his or her imagination to be stretched, even just a little, in a way that an unambiguously punctuated sign would not.  No, the hyphenated sign is a railroad, grabbing the reader&#039;s mind and demanding it follow one path. Unhyphenated, the reader is a little freeer than he or she would otherwise have been.  Freedom, as we were told, somewhat impliedly, by QFX in 1994, is a thing most nifty.

Also, aloud, HUGE RUG SALE is funner to say, equal emphasis on each word, than HUGE-RUG SALE or HUGE RUG-SALE, which is singsongier and therefore leaves the speaker sounding like a primary school teacher attempting to mask fury or some sort of unbearably keen children&#039;s television presenter (depending on accent), neither of which is What You Want.

None of which is to denigrate your blogpost, and is, in truth, just a way for me to pass time that would otherwise be given over to unbillable seagull watching (see?  DO YOU SEE?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hyphen is urgent and key, yes, particularly when dealing with less than canonically phrased phrases; it can aid interpretation and, by increasing the speed with which the text can be comprehended, allows the reader to plough on, unbefuddled.   However, for reasons other than mere contrariness, I would argue that ambiguity is, outside of specific (and often legal) contexts, something that should be revelled in.  Setting aside the possibility that the HRS sign is adverting to a huge sale of huge rugs (something worth considering in these increasingly non-binary (first hyphen!) times), the lack of punctuative clarification allows the beholder the opportunity to visualise if not a panoply then at least an array of possibilities, to allow his or her imagination to be stretched, even just a little, in a way that an unambiguously punctuated sign would not.  No, the hyphenated sign is a railroad, grabbing the reader&#8217;s mind and demanding it follow one path. Unhyphenated, the reader is a little freeer than he or she would otherwise have been.  Freedom, as we were told, somewhat impliedly, by QFX in 1994, is a thing most nifty.</p>
<p>Also, aloud, HUGE RUG SALE is funner to say, equal emphasis on each word, than HUGE-RUG SALE or HUGE RUG-SALE, which is singsongier and therefore leaves the speaker sounding like a primary school teacher attempting to mask fury or some sort of unbearably keen children&#8217;s television presenter (depending on accent), neither of which is What You Want.</p>
<p>None of which is to denigrate your blogpost, and is, in truth, just a way for me to pass time that would otherwise be given over to unbillable seagull watching (see?  DO YOU SEE?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pages tagged "punctilious"</title>
		<link>http://imjon.com/2008/10/01/i-love-hyphens/comment-page-1/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>Pages tagged "punctilious"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imjon.com/2008/10/01/i-love-hyphens/#comment-624</guid>
		<description>[...] bookmarks tagged punctilious I love hyphens&#160;saved by 2 others  &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;spricket24 bookmarked on 10/01/08 &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bookmarks tagged punctilious I love hyphens&nbsp;saved by 2 others  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;spricket24 bookmarked on 10/01/08 | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

